Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Member:sungbeanJo_GG [2020/11/24 20:18]
sungbean
Member:sungbeanJo_GG [2020/11/24 20:25] (current)
sungbean
Line 1: Line 1:
-Ground elevation data can be collected using several +The trial has successfully demonstrated ROSEN’s 
-methodsAccurate ​data for small areas can be collected using differential global positioning system (DGPS) +methodology to estimate the depth of cover over 
-survey equipment. To capture ​ground elevation data on a +pipelinesThis includes producing an accurate 
-larger scale, a LiDAR sensor can be attached ​to aircraft+pipeline centreline from data obtained during a 
-LiDAR is a +routine internal inspection, combined with ground 
-remote sensing +elevation data available from the Environment 
-method which +Agency (EA) to calculate depth of cover
-uses laser light +• The results of the calculation have been validated 
-to measure +against infield depth of cover measurements obtained using pipe and cable locator. The accuracy 
-distance to +of the depth of cover results has been calculated 
-target ​and +using root mean square (RMS) error method. This 
-is commonly +has determined an overall accuracy ​of ±0.15 m using EA LiDAR data. 
-used to map +• Infield ground surface measurements were compared with the EA LiDAR and OS Terrain ​data. 
-terrain and surface objects. +
-The advantage +
-of this method +
-is that large +
-amount ​of +
-highly accurate +
-data can be +
-collected allowing large areas +
-to be surveyed +
-efficiently.+
Navigation